The origin
The Work Map started with a disagreement. One of us was convinced AI would swallow most of a community manager’s week; the other was convinced it would barely touch it. The only honest way to settle it was to write the job down — all of it — and argue about every line.
So we did. We inventoried the work the way practitioners actually experience it: not job descriptions, but jobs to be done. The Tuesday-afternoon moderation queue. The quiet check-in with a member who went dark. The invisible relational work no dashboard has ever measured.
This report is what came out the other side. It changed both of our minds.
The method
We organized the work along two axes. Eight stages of the community journey — Attract, Onboard, Engage, Educate, Retain, Grow, Advocate, Operate — and seven community types, because the job of a developer-community manager is not the job of an association director.
Then we classified every job three ways. Agent, when today’s tools can carry it end to end. Human, when the work depends on trust, judgment, or presence. Hybrid, when the honest answer is both, together.
We classified conservatively. When we weren’t sure, we kept it human. The map should underestimate the machines, never the people.
What the map reveals
The headline is not that AI takes the job. It’s that the job splits. Most of what community managers do turns out to be shared work — jobs where an agent drafts, monitors, or summarizes, and a person decides, relates, and repairs.
The distribution is not even, and that’s the useful part. Operational and top-of-funnel work leans hard toward agents. Retention and advocacy stay stubbornly human. If you want to know where your role is heading, look at which stages fill your calendar.
What stays human
Strip away the busy work and what remains is the reason most of us took this job in the first place: building trust, resolving conflict, spotting the member who is about to become a leader, deciding what a community should be.
None of that automates, because none of it is a task. It’s a relationship held over time — and the map says the field is moving toward that work, not away from it.
The invitation
The map is open, and it is not finished. 298 jobs is our count — from two careers’ worth of practice and a year of arguing. Yours will differ.
If your practice looks different — a job we missed, a classification you’d fight us on — tell us. The map gets better the way communities do: someone shows up and contributes.